Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Signaling the trustworthiness of science should not be a substitute for direct action against research misconduct
6
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2019
Jahr
Abstract
The paper “Signaling the trustworthiness of science,” by Jamieson et al. (1), offers suggestions as to what could be done by scientists to reassure “other scientists and, perhaps more importantly, the public that [the] norms [of science] are being upheld.” They believe such trust has been undermined by “instances of misconduct or fraud…failures to replicate key findings…and a rise in … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: dsk3{at}cumc.columbia.edu. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1
Ähnliche Arbeiten
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
2022 · 2.691 Zit.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
1998 · 2.491 Zit.
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
2012 · 2.304 Zit.
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
2009 · 1.920 Zit.
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
2023 · 1.765 Zit.