Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy
18
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
Searching practices vary considerably across systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy. Unpublished studies are a minimal fraction of the evidence included in recent reviews.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 89.186 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 83.022 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.734 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.362 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 62.035 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers(NL)
- University of Amsterdam(NL)
- Ottawa Hospital(CA)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
- Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades(FR)
- Inserm(FR)
- Université Paris Cité(FR)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris(FR)
- Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique(FR)
- University of Ottawa(CA)
- Utrecht University(NL)
- University Medical Center Utrecht(NL)