Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The CrowdHEALTH project and the Hollistic Health Records: Collective Wisdom Driving Public Health Policies
42
Zitationen
33
Autoren
2019
Jahr
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: With the expansion of available Information and Communication Technology (ICT) services, a plethora of data sources provide structured and unstructured data used to detect certain health conditions or indicators of disease. Data is spread across various settings, stored and managed in different systems. Due to the lack of technology interoperability and the large amounts of health-related data, data exploitation has not reached its full potential yet. AIM: The aim of the CrowdHEALTH approach, is to introduce a new paradigm of Holistic Health Records (HHRs) that include all health determinants defining health status by using big data management mechanisms. METHODS: HHRs are transformed into HHRs clusters capturing the clinical, social and human context with the aim to benefit from the collective knowledge. The presented approach integrates big data technologies, providing Data as a Service (DaaS) to healthcare professionals and policy makers towards a "health in all policies" approach. A toolkit, on top of the DaaS, providing mechanisms for causal and risk analysis, and for the compilation of predictions is developed. RESULTS: CrowdHEALTH platform is based on three main pillars: Data & structures, Health analytics, and Policies. CONCLUSIONS: A holistic approach for capturing all health determinants in the proposed HHRs, while creating clusters of them to exploit collective knowledge with the aim of the provision of insight for different population segments according to different factors (e.g. location, occupation, medication status, emerging risks, etc) was presented. The aforementioned approach is under evaluation through different scenarios with heterogeneous data from multiple sources.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age
2015 · 13.128 Zit.
A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
2012 · 11.974 Zit.
SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003
2006 · 11.477 Zit.
NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease
2018 · 10.187 Zit.
Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
2020 · 9.423 Zit.
Autoren
- Dimosthenis Kyriazis
- Serge Autexier
- Iv Brondino
- Michael Boniface
- Lucas Donat
- Vegard Engen
- Rafael Fernández
- Ricardo Peris
- Blanca Jordan
- Gregor Jurak
- Athanasios Kiourtis
- Thanos Kosmidis
- Mitja Luštrek
- Ilias Maglogiannis
- John Mantas
- Antonio Martínez
- Argyro Mavrogiorgou
- Andreas Menychtas
- Lydia Montandon
- Cosmin Septimiu Nechifor
- Sokratis Nifakos
- Alexandra Papageorgiou
- Marta Patiño
- Manuel Perez
- Vassilis P. Plagianakos
- Dalibor Stanimirović
- Gregor Starc
- Tanja Tomson
- Francesco Torelli
- Vicente Traver
- George Vassilacopoulos
- Andriana Magdalinou
- Usman Wajid
Institutionen
- University of Piraeus(GR)
- German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence(DE)
- Deutsches Forschungsnetz(DE)
- University of Southampton(GB)
- University of Ljubljana(SI)
- Jožef Stefan Institute(SI)
- European Society for Medical Oncology(CH)
- Fundacio Investigacio Hospital General Universitari De Valencia(ES)
- Atos (Spain)(ES)
- Siemens (Romania)(RO)
- Karolinska Institutet(SE)
- National Public Health Organization(GR)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid(ES)
- National Institute of Public Health(SI)
- Engineering (Italy)(IT)
- Ingegneria dei Sistemi (Italy)(IT)
- Catalyst Health Economics Consultants Ltd(GB)