Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis
444
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The application of bibliometrics in medicine enables one to analyse vast amounts of publications and their production patterns on macroscopic and microscopic levels. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyse the historical perspective of research literature production regarding application of bibliometrics in medicine. METHODS: Publications related to application of bibliometrics in medicine from 1970 to 2018 were harvested from the Scopus bibliographic database. Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy was triangulated with the VOSViewer to identify historical roots and evolution of topics and clinical areas. RESULTS: The search resulted in 6557 publications. The literature production trend was positive. Historical roots analysis identified 33 historical roots and 16 clinical areas where bibliometrics was applied. DISCUSSION: The increase in productivity in application of bibliometrics in medicine might be attributed to increased use of quantitative metrics in research evaluation, publish or perish phenomenon and the increased use of evidence-based medicine. CONCLUSION: The trend of the literature production was positive. Medicine was in the forefront of knowledge development in bibliometrics. reference publication year spectroscopy proved to be an accurate method which was able to identify most of the historical roots.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis
2021 · 1.552 Zit.
A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers
2020 · 1.372 Zit.
Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis
2010 · 1.348 Zit.
COVID-19 pandemic
2021 · 489 Zit.
Fundamentos Epistémicos de la Investigación Cualitativa y Cuantitativa: Consensos y Disensos
2019 · 409 Zit.