Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers
1.147
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
T he advent of deep neural networks as a new artifi- cial intelligence (AI) technique has engendered a large number of medical applications, particularly in medical imaging. Such applications of AI must remain grounded in the fundamental tenets of science and scientific publication (1). Scientific results must be reproducible, and a scientific publication must describe the authors' work in sufficient detail to enable readers to determine the rigor, quality, and generalizability of the work, and potentially to reproduce the work's results. A number of valuable manuscript checklists have come into widespread use, including the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) (2-5), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) (6), and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) (7,8). A radiomics quality score has been proposed to assess the quality of radiomics studies (9).
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 28.780 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.483 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.732 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.098 Zit.