Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Toward global standardization of conducting fair investigations of allegations of research misconduct
31
Zitationen
20
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
In the United States, through nation-wide discussions, the procedures for handling allegations of research misconduct are now well established. Procedures are geared toward carefully treating both complainants and respondents fairly in accordance with the US framework. Other countries, which have their own cultural and legal framework, also need fair and legally compatible procedures for conducting investigations of allegations of research misconduct. Given the rapid growth of international collaboration in research, it is desirable to have a global standard, or common ground, for misconduct investigations. Institutions need clear guidance on important subjects such as what information should be included in the investigation reports, how the investigation committee should be organized once research misconduct allegation has been received, how to conduct the investigation, how the data and information obtained should be taken as evidence for vs. against misconduct, and what policies the investigation committee should follow. We explore these issues from the viewpoint of members of committees investigating accusations of research misconduct (hereafter referred to as "investigation committees") as well as persons overseeing the committees in Japan. We hope to engender productive discussions among experts in misconduct investigations, leading to a formulation of international standards for such investigation.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
2022 · 2.691 Zit.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
1998 · 2.490 Zit.
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
2012 · 2.303 Zit.
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
2009 · 1.918 Zit.
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
2023 · 1.744 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Shinshu University(JP)
- The University of Tokyo(JP)
- National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry(JP)
- Teikyo University(JP)
- Juntendo University(JP)
- Tokyo Institute of Technology(JP)
- Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency(JP)
- Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine(JP)
- Astellas Pharma (Japan)(JP)
- Tokai University(JP)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science(JP)
- Keio University(JP)
- Ochanomizu University(JP)
- Tokyo Women's Medical University(JP)
- Protein Research Foundation(JP)
- Osaka University(JP)
- Tokyo Medical and Dental University(JP)