Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Meta-analysis is not always the best way to round out a systematic review: a few thoughts prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic and “spiced-up” with an earthquake
5
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
Meta-analysis is not always the best way to round out a systematic review: a few thoughts prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic and "spiced-up" with an earthquake
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 85.343 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.806 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 76.965 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.811 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.529 Zit.