Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Questionnaire analysis of clinical research capacity and training needs for physicians at university hospitals
1
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2017
Jahr
Abstract
Objective Through investigating the clinicians' scientific research level and weakness, we can carry out targeted clinical research training systematically, and then strengthen their utilization of clinical resources and data, and finally promote the transformation of scientific research results. Methods Filling and submitting the online questionnaires through WeChat, a popular chatting tool in China, physicians from 13 affiliated hospitals of a university in Shanghai have joined this research. Results 507 valid questionnaires have been received online: In terms of clinical research capacity, there seemed to be more barriers in the following issues: comprehension of the types and applications to design a clinical trial, formulation of the details including PICO elements(Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome), methodological application including the category and principle of randomization, the category and principle of blind method and how to control the confounding elements and probable bias, and statistical problems in scientific research including discrimination of the different definition between FAS(Full Analysis Set) based on the principle of ITT(Intention-To-Treat) and PPS(Per-Protocol Set), how to write a standardized SAP(Statistical Analysis Plan) and how to calculate the sample size of a trial), and various management of clinical trials including data management, follow-up management, adverse event management and so on, and writing a protocol and a CRF (Case Report Form) in a standard and professional way. As for the needs for training, the top three topics were how to design a clinical research in a standardized style, how to practice the methodology and how to utilize the statistical skills into clinical trials. Conclusions Standardized design and writing of clinical trial protocols according to the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) and SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials), and the application of epidemiological and statistical methods are still short boards that most clinicians need to improve urgently, also are what they most concerned about at the same time. So it is necessary for physicians to receive systematic clinical research training to enhance their scientific research capacity. Key words: Clinical research; Physicians; Training requirements; Questionnaire
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 84.856 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.787 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 76.851 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.738 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.458 Zit.