Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Principles to Practices for Responsible AI: Closing the Gap
62
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
Companies have considered adoption of various high-level artificial intelligence (AI) principles for responsible AI, but there is less clarity on how to implement these principles as organizational practices. This paper reviews the principles-to-practices gap. We outline five explanations for this gap ranging from a disciplinary divide to an overabundance of tools. In turn, we argue that an impact assessment framework which is broad, operationalizable, flexible, iterative, guided, and participatory is a promising approach to close the principles-to-practices gap. Finally, to help practitioners with applying these recommendations, we review a case study of AI's use in forest ecosystem restoration, demonstrating how an impact assessment framework can translate into effective and responsible AI practices.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.514 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.859 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.386 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.269 Zit.
Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer
1987 · 3.183 Zit.