Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Questionable Research Practices: How to Recognize and Avoid Them
9
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
This article focuses on questionable research practices (QRPs) that bias findings and conclusions. QRPs cast doubt on the credibility of research findings in home health and nursing science in general. They assault the research integrity of all researchers to the extent they are permitted to exist at all. Each QRP is defined via bundles of specific research behaviors with unifying labels that include deceptive mirages and phantom sharpshooters among others. These questionable behaviors are described in ways that enhance research understanding and enable QRP avoidance by careful home health nurse researchers using higher standards of scientific rigor. QRPs impede scientific progress by generating false conclusions. They threaten the validity and dependability of scientific research and confuse other researchers who practice rigorous science and maintain integrity. QRPs also clog the literature with studies that cannot be replicated. When researchers engage in QRPs at the expense of rigor, overall trust in the scientific knowledge base erodes.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.818 Zit.
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
2005 · 8.922 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 6.932 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.203 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.482 Zit.