Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Patient safety and quality improvement: Ethical principles for a regulatory approach to bias in healthcare machine learning
100
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
Accumulating evidence demonstrates the impact of bias that reflects social inequality on the performance of machine learning (ML) models in health care. Given their intended placement within healthcare decision making more broadly, ML tools require attention to adequately quantify the impact of bias and reduce its potential to exacerbate inequalities. We suggest that taking a patient safety and quality improvement approach to bias can support the quantification of bias-related effects on ML. Drawing from the ethical principles underpinning these approaches, we argue that patient safety and quality improvement lenses support the quantification of relevant performance metrics, in order to minimize harm while promoting accountability, justice, and transparency. We identify specific methods for operationalizing these principles with the goal of attending to bias to support better decision making in light of controllable and uncontrollable factors.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2011 · 33.449 Zit.
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
2020 · 18.341 Zit.
To Err Is Human
2000 · 14.066 Zit.
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
2007 · 9.414 Zit.
KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease
2024 · 6.665 Zit.