Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Data for registry and quality review can be retrospectively collected using natural language processing from unstructured charts of arthroplasty patients
42
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
AIMS: Natural Language Processing (NLP) offers an automated method to extract data from unstructured free text fields for arthroplasty registry participation. Our objective was to investigate how accurately NLP can be used to extract structured clinical data from unstructured clinical notes when compared with manual data extraction. METHODS: A group of 1,000 randomly selected clinical and hospital notes from eight different surgeons were collected for patients undergoing primary arthroplasty between 2012 and 2018. In all, 19 preoperative, 17 operative, and two postoperative variables of interest were manually extracted from these notes. A NLP algorithm was created to automatically extract these variables from a training sample of these notes, and the algorithm was tested on a random test sample of notes. Performance of the NLP algorithm was measured in Statistical Analysis System (SAS) by calculating the accuracy of the variables collected, the ability of the algorithm to collect the correct information when it was indeed in the note (sensitivity), and the ability of the algorithm to not collect a certain data element when it was not in the note (specificity). RESULTS: The NLP algorithm performed well at extracting variables from unstructured data in our random test dataset (accuracy = 96.3%, sensitivity = 95.2%, and specificity = 97.4%). It performed better at extracting data that were in a structured, templated format such as range of movement (ROM) (accuracy = 98%) and implant brand (accuracy = 98%) than data that were entered with variation depending on the author of the note such as the presence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) (accuracy = 90%). CONCLUSION: 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):99-104.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030
2007 · 6.886 Zit.
Treatment of Deep Cartilage Defects in the Knee with Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation
1994 · 5.495 Zit.
Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030
2007 · 5.437 Zit.
Rating Systems in the Evaluation of Knee Ligament Injuries
1985 · 4.563 Zit.
Rationale, of The Knee Society Clinical Rating System
1989 · 4.532 Zit.