OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 01.05.2026, 23:32

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high

2020·47 Zitationen·British Journal of Sports Medicine
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

47

Zitationen

5

Autoren

2020

Jahr

Abstract

We extracted data relating to whether studies reported that the primary hypothesis was supported or rejected by the results. Study hypotheses, methodologies, and analysis plans were preregistered at the Open Science Framework. One hundred and twenty-nine original research studies reported at least one study hypothesis, of which 106 (82.2%) reported hypotheses that were supported by study results. Of 106 studies reporting that primary hypotheses were supported by study results, 75 (70.8%) studies reported that the primary hypothesis was fully supported by study results. The primary study hypothesis was partially supported by study results in 28 (26.4%) studies. We detail open science practices and resources that aim to safe-guard against QRPs that bely the credibility and replicability of original research findings.

Ähnliche Arbeiten

Autoren

Institutionen

Themen

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationSports injuries and prevention
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen