Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion
67
Zitationen
18
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
P&T committees can critically appraise the quality and impact of digital scholarship using specific, validated tools. Applicants for appointment and promotion should highlight and prepare their digital scholarship to specifically address quality, impact, breadth, and relevance. It is our goal to provide specific, timely guidance for both stakeholders to recognize the value of digital scholarship in advancing our field.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Health Literacy
2004 · 3.408 Zit.
eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale
2006 · 2.564 Zit.
Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU)
2015 · 2.521 Zit.
A New Dimension of Health Care: Systematic Review of the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Social Media for Health Communication
2013 · 2.507 Zit.
What is e-health?
2001 · 2.485 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Northwell Health(US)
- Staten Island University Hospital(US)
- Temple University(US)
- Thomas Jefferson University(US)
- Northwestern University(US)
- University of Calgary(CA)
- University of California, Los Angeles(US)
- University of San Francisco(US)
- University of Minnesota Medical Center(US)
- Mount Sinai Hospital(US)
- Mayo Clinic(US)
- McMaster University(CA)
- Geisinger Medical Center(US)
- University of Southern California(US)
- Stanford University(US)
- Rush University Medical Center(US)
- University of Florida(US)
- Florida College(US)