Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
DeepConsensus: Consensus-based Interpretable Deep Neural Networks with Application to Mortality Prediction
10
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
Deep neural networks have achieved remarkable success in various challenging tasks. However, the black-box nature of such networks is not acceptable to critical applications, such as healthcare. In particular, the existence of adversarial examples and their overgeneralization to irrelevant, out-of-distribution inputs with high confidence makes it difficult, if not impossible, to explain decisions by such networks. In this paper, we analyze the underlying mechanism of generalization of deep neural networks and propose an (<i>n</i>, <i>k</i>) consensus algorithm which is insensitive to adversarial examples and can reliably reject out-of-distribution samples. Furthermore, the consensus algorithm is able to improve classification accuracy by using multiple trained deep neural networks. To handle the complexity of deep neural networks, we cluster linear approximations of individual models and identify highly correlated clusters among different models to capture feature importance robustly, resulting in improved interpretability. Motivated by the importance of building accurate and interpretable prediction models for healthcare, our experimental results on an ICU dataset show the effectiveness of our algorithm in enhancing both the prediction accuracy and the interpretability of deep neural network models on one-year patient mortality prediction. In particular, while the proposed method maintains similar interpretability as conventional shallow models such as logistic regression, it improves the prediction accuracy significantly.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization
2017 · 20.253 Zit.
Generative Adversarial Nets
2023 · 19.841 Zit.
Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks
2014 · 15.230 Zit.
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.156 Zit.
On a Method to Measure Supervised Multiclass Model’s Interpretability: Application to Degradation Diagnosis (Short Paper)
2024 · 13.093 Zit.