Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Tailored PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams for living systematic reviews: a methodological survey and a proposal
15
Zitationen
8
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
<ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Background</ns3:bold> : While the PRISMA flow diagram is widely used for reporting standard systematic reviews (SRs), it was not designed for capturing the results of continual searches for studies in living systematic reviews (LSRs). The objectives of this study are (1) to assess how published LSRs report on the flow of studies through the different phases of the review for the different updates; (2) to propose an approach to reporting on that flow. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Methods</ns3:bold> : For objective 1, we identified all LSRs published up to July 2020. We abstracted information regarding their general characteristics and how they reported on search results. For objective 2, we based our proposal for tailored PRISMA approaches on the findings from objective 1, as well as on our experience with conducting Cochrane LSRs. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Results:</ns3:bold> We identified 108 living publications relating to 32 LSRs. Of the 108 publications, 7% were protocols, 24% were base versions (i.e., the first version), 62% were partial updates (i.e., does not include all typical sections of an SR), and 7% were full updates (i.e., includes all typical sections of an SR). We identified six ways to reporting the study flow: base separately, each update separately (38%); numbers not reported (32%); latest update separately, all previous versions combined (20%); base separately, all updates combined (7%); latest update version only (3%); all versions combined (0%). We propose recording in detail the results of the searches to keep track of all identified records. For structuring the flow diagram, we propose using one of four approaches. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Conclusion:</ns3:bold> We identified six ways for reporting the study flow through the different phases of the review for the different update versions. We propose to document in detail the study flow for the different search updates and select one of our four tailored PRISMA diagram approaches to present that study flow. </ns3:p>
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 84.807 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.774 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 76.832 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.698 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.430 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- American University of Beirut(LB)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública(ES)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam(NL)
- Biomedical Research Institute(US)
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre(ES)
- McMaster University(CA)
- University of Hull(GB)
- Hull York Medical School(GB)
- Impact(CA)
- Stockholm University(SE)
- University of Johannesburg(ZA)
- Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change(DE)
- Stockholm Environment Institute(SE)