Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Z-Inspection<sup>®</sup>: A Process to Assess Trustworthy AI
111
Zitationen
17
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
The ethical and societal implications of artificial intelligence systems raise concerns. In this article, we outline a novel process based on applied ethics, namely, Z-Inspection <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">®</sup> , to assess if an AI system is trustworthy. We use the definition of trustworthy AI given by the high-level European Commission's expert group on AI. Z-Inspection <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">®</sup> is a general inspection process that can be applied to a variety of domains where AI systems are used, such as business, healthcare, and public sector, among many others. To the best of our knowledge, Z-Inspection <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">®</sup> is the first process to assess trustworthy AI in practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
2016 · 30.292 Zit.
MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks
2018 · 24.341 Zit.
An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
2020 · 21.280 Zit.
CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module
2018 · 21.200 Zit.
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
2015 · 18.476 Zit.