Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Validating Whole Slide Imaging Systems for Diagnostic Purposes in Pathology
174
Zitationen
14
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
CONTEXT.—: The original guideline, "Validating Whole Slide Imaging for Diagnostic Purposes in Pathology," was published in 2013 and included 12 guideline statements. The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to update the guideline following standards established by the National Academies of Medicine for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE.—: To assess evidence published since the release of the original guideline and provide updated recommendations for validating whole slide imaging (WSI) systems used for diagnostic purposes. DESIGN.—: An expert panel performed a systematic review of the literature. Frozen sections, anatomic pathology specimens (biopsies, curettings, and resections), and hematopathology cases were included. Cytology cases were excluded. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, the panel reassessed and updated the original guideline recommendations. RESULTS.—: Three strong recommendations and 9 good practice statements are offered to assist laboratories with validating WSI digital pathology systems. CONCLUSIONS.—: Systematic review of literature following release of the 2013 guideline reaffirms the use of a validation set of at least 60 cases, establishing intraobserver diagnostic concordance between WSI and glass slides and the use of a 2-week washout period between modalities. Although all discordances between WSI and glass slide diagnoses discovered during validation need to be reconciled, laboratories should be particularly concerned if their overall WSI-glass slide concordance is less than 95%.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.533 Zit.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
2008 · 25.073 Zit.
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
2008 · 21.558 Zit.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network
1998 · 16.869 Zit.
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
1996 · 15.608 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- York Central Hospital(CA)
- Memorial Hermann(US)
- Moffitt Cancer Center(US)
- American Society of Clinical Oncology(US)
- American Society for Clinical Pathology(US)
- University of Michigan–Ann Arbor(US)
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center(US)
- Reid Health(US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center(US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center(US)
- Cleveland Clinic(US)
- Janssen (United States)(US)
- Thomas College(US)
- College of American Pathologists(US)