Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Stakeholder Perspectives of Attributes and Features of Context Relevant to Knowledge Translation in Health Settings: A Multi-Country Analysis
47
Zitationen
17
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Context is recognized as important to successful knowledge translation (KT) in health settings. What is meant by context, however, is poorly understood. The purpose of the current study was to elicit tacit knowledge about what is perceived to constitute context by conducting interviews with a variety of health system stakeholders internationally so as to compile a comprehensive list of contextual attributes and their features relevant to KT in healthcare. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with health system stakeholders (change agents/KT specialists and KT researchers) in four countries: Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Interview transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic content analysis in four steps: (1) selection of utterances describing context, (2) coding of features of context, (3) categorizing of features into attributes of context, (4) comparison of attributes and features by: country, KT experience, and role. RESULTS: A total of 39 interviews were conducted. We identified 66 unique features of context, categorized into 16 attributes. One attribute, Facility Characteristics, was not represented in previously published KT frameworks. We found instances of all 16 attributes in the interviews irrespective of country, level of experience with KT, and primary role (change agent/KT specialist vs. KT researcher), revealing robustness and transferability of the attributes identified. We also identified 30 new context features (across 13 of the 16 attributes). CONCLUSION: The findings from this study represent an important advancement in the KT field; we provide much needed conceptual clarity in context, which is essential to the development of common assessment tools to measure context to determine which context attributes and features are more or less important in different contexts for improving KT success.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
2007 · 40.584 Zit.
Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews
2016 · 23.816 Zit.
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
2019 · 16.426 Zit.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
2008 · 15.801 Zit.
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science
2009 · 14.615 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- University of Ottawa(CA)
- Ottawa Hospital(CA)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
- Deakin University(AU)
- Monash Health(AU)
- University of Toronto(CA)
- Dalhousie University(CA)
- Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre(CA)
- Statistics Canada(CA)
- The University of Melbourne(AU)
- Women's College Hospital(CA)
- McMaster University(CA)
- University College London(GB)
- Ministry of Health and Long Term Care(CA)
- University of Calgary(CA)