Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Technology in Palliative Care (TIP): the identification of digital priorities for palliative care research using a modified Delphi method
3
Zitationen
9
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Developments in digital health (describing technologies which use computing platforms, connectivity, software, and sensors for health care and related purposes) has the potential to transform the delivery of health and social care to help citizens manage their own health. Currently, we lack consensus about digital health research priorities in palliative care and lack theories about how these technologies might improve care outcomes. Global palliative care need is expected to increase due to the consequences of an ageing population; therefore, it is important for healthcare leaders to identify innovations to ensure that an increasingly frail population have appropriate access to palliative care services. Consequently, it is important to articulate research priorities as the first step to determine how we should allocate finite resources to a field saturated with rapidly developing innovations. Aims To identify research priority areas for digital health in palliative care. Methods We selected the digital health trends, most relevant to palliative care, from a list of emerging trends reported by the ‘Future Today Institute’. We conducted a modified Delphi process and consensus meeting with palliative care experts to identify research priorities. We used the views of public representatives to gain their perspectives of the agreed priorities. Results One hundred and three experts (representing 11 countries) participated in the 1st Delphi round. Fifty-five participated in the 2 nd round (53% of 1 st round). Eleven experts attended the final consensus meeting. We identified 16 priorities areas, which were summarised into eight themes. These themes were: big data, mobile devices, telehealth and telemedicine, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, the smart home, biotechnology and digital legacy. Conclusions The identified priorities in this paper represent a wide range of important emerging areas in field of digital health, personalised medicine, and data science. Human-centred design and robust governance systems should be considered in future research. It is important that the risks of using these technologies in palliative care are properly addressed to ensure that these tools are used meaningfully, wisely and safely and do not cause unintentional harm.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Early Palliative Care for Patients with Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
2010 · 7.289 Zit.
Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation
2005 · 5.218 Zit.
Rehospitalizations among Patients in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Program
2009 · 5.149 Zit.
On death and dying.
1975 · 4.940 Zit.
Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)
1997 · 4.078 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- University of Liverpool(GB)
- Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust(GB)
- Lancaster University(GB)
- Marie Curie Hospice(GB)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute(US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital(US)
- Harvard University(US)
- Hospice UK(GB)
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation(NL)
- University of Edinburgh(GB)