Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Determining breast cancer biomarker status and associated morphological features using deep learning
148
Zitationen
20
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer management depends on biomarkers including estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ER/PR/HER2). Though existing scoring systems are widely used and well-validated, they can involve costly preparation and variable interpretation. Additionally, discordances between histology and expected biomarker findings can prompt repeat testing to address biological, interpretative, or technical reasons for unexpected results. Methods: = 3274 slides, 1249 cases, 37 sites). Interpretability analyses were performed using Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV), saliency analysis, and pathologist review of clustered patches. Results: The patch-level AUCs are 0.939 (95%CI 0.936-0.941), 0.938 (0.936-0.940), and 0.808 (0.802-0.813) for ER/PR/HER2, respectively. At the slide level, AUCs are 0.86 (95%CI 0.84-0.87), 0.75 (0.73-0.77), and 0.60 (0.56-0.64) for ER/PR/HER2, respectively. Interpretability analyses show known biomarker-histomorphology associations including associations of low-grade and lobular histology with ER/PR positivity, and increased inflammatory infiltrates with triple-negative staining. Conclusions: This study presents rapid breast cancer biomarker estimation from routine H&E slides and builds on prior advances by prioritizing interpretability of computationally learned features in the context of existing pathological knowledge.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 14.019 Zit.
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
2011 · 13.808 Zit.
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
2017 · 13.528 Zit.
A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
2019 · 12.149 Zit.
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
2017 · 8.437 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Google (United States)(US)
- University of Nottingham(GB)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa(US)
- Cancer Center of Hawaii(US)
- Magee-Womens Hospital(US)
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center
- Medical University of Graz(AT)
- Defense Systems (United States)(US)
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation(US)
- Jackson Foundation(US)
- Naval Medical Center San Diego(US)