Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Public Covid-19 X-ray datasets and their impact on model bias – A systematic review of a significant problem
65
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
Computer-aided-diagnosis and stratification of COVID-19 based on chest X-ray suffers from weak bias assessment and limited quality-control. Undetected bias induced by inappropriate use of datasets, and improper consideration of confounders prevents the translation of prediction models into clinical practice. By adopting established tools for model evaluation to the task of evaluating datasets, this study provides a systematic appraisal of publicly available COVID-19 chest X-ray datasets, determining their potential use and evaluating potential sources of bias. Only 9 out of more than a hundred identified datasets met at least the criteria for proper assessment of risk of bias and could be analysed in detail. Remarkably most of the datasets utilised in 201 papers published in peer-reviewed journals, are not among these 9 datasets, thus leading to models with high risk of bias. This raises concerns about the suitability of such models for clinical use. This systematic review highlights the limited description of datasets employed for modelling and aids researchers to select the most suitable datasets for their task.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study
2020 · 22.609 Zit.
La certeza de lo impredecible: Cultura Educación y Sociedad en tiempos de COVID19
2020 · 19.271 Zit.
A Multi-Modal Distributed Real-Time IoT System for Urban Traffic Control (Invited Paper)
2024 · 14.253 Zit.
UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation
2018 · 8.498 Zit.
Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions
2021 · 7.114 Zit.