Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
X-ray versus computerized tomography (CT) images for detection of COVID-19 using deep learning
1
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
<ns3:p><ns3:bold>Background: </ns3:bold>The recent outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the disease corresponding to it (coronavirus disease 2019; COVID-19) has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. COVID-19 has become a global crisis, shattering health care systems, and weakening economies of most countries. The current methods of testing that are employed include reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), rapid antigen testing, and lateral flow testing with RT-PCR being used as the golden standard despite its accuracy being at a mere 63%. It is a manual process which is time consuming, taking about an average of 48 hours to obtain the results. Alternative methods employing deep learning techniques and radiologic images are up and coming.</ns3:p><ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Methods</ns3:bold><ns3:bold>: </ns3:bold>In this paper, we used a dataset consisting of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 folders for both X-Ray and CT images which contained a total number of 17,599 images. This dataset has been used to compare 3 (non-pre-trained) CNN models and 5 pre-trained models and their performances in detecting COVID-19 under various parameters like validation accuracy, training accuracy, validation loss, training loss, prediction accuracy, sensitivity and the training time required, with CT and X-Ray images separately.</ns3:p><ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Results: </ns3:bold>Xception provided the highest validation accuracy (88%) when trained with the dataset containing the X- ray images while VGG19 provided the highest validation accuracy (81.2%) when CT images are used for training.</ns3:p><ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Conclusions:</ns3:bold> The model, VGG16, showed the most consistent performance, with a validation accuracy of 76.6% for CT images and 87.76% for X-ray images. When comparing the results between the modalities, models trained with the X-ray dataset showed better performances than the same models trained with CT images. Hence, it can be concluded that X-ray images provide a higher accuracy in detecting COVID-19 making it an effective method for detecting COVID-19 in real life.</ns3:p>
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study
2020 · 22.636 Zit.
La certeza de lo impredecible: Cultura Educación y Sociedad en tiempos de COVID19
2020 · 19.284 Zit.
A Multi-Modal Distributed Real-Time IoT System for Urban Traffic Control (Invited Paper)
2024 · 14.279 Zit.
UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation
2018 · 8.658 Zit.
Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions
2021 · 7.284 Zit.