Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Surgical Skill Evaluation From Robot-Assisted Surgery Recordings
17
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
Quality and safety are critical elements in the performance of surgeries. Therefore, surgical trainees need to obtain the required degrees of expertise before operating on patients. Conventionally, a trainee’s performance is evaluated by qualitative methods that are time-consuming and prone to bias. Using autonomous and quantitative surgical skill assessment improves the consistency, repeatability, and reliability of the evaluation. To this end, this paper proposes a video-based deep learning framework for surgical skill assessment. By incorporating prior knowledge on surgeon’s activity in the system design, we decompose the complex task of spatio-temporal representation learning from video recordings into two independent, relatively-simple learning processes, which greatly reduces the model size. We evaluate the proposed framework using the publicly available JIGSAWS robotic surgery dataset and demonstrate its capability to learn the underlying features of surgical maneuvers and the dynamic interplay between sequences of actions effectively. The skill level classification accuracy of 97.27% on the public dataset demonstrates the superiority of the proposed model over prior video-based skill assessment methods. The code of this paper will be available on Github at link: ${\color{blue}{\text{sourceCode}}}$.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines
2020 · 5.573 Zit.
Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance
2002 · 2.792 Zit.
An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data
2008 · 2.508 Zit.
Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents
1997 · 2.259 Zit.
Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the Evidence
2011 · 1.710 Zit.