Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer: the PANDA challenge
390
Zitationen
33
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Through a community-driven competition, the PANDA challenge provides a curated diverse dataset and a catalog of models for prostate cancer pathology, and represents a blueprint for evaluating AI algorithms in digital pathology.Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise for diagnosing prostate cancer in biopsies. However, results have been limited to individual studies, lacking validation in multinational settings. Competitions have been shown to be accelerators for medical imaging innovations, but their impact is hindered by lack of reproducibility and independent validation. With this in mind, we organized the PANDA challenge-the largest histopathology competition to date, joined by 1,290 developers-to catalyze development of reproducible AI algorithms for Gleason grading using 10,616 digitized prostate biopsies. We validated that a diverse set of submitted algorithms reached pathologist-level performance on independent cross-continental cohorts, fully blinded to the algorithm developers. On United States and European external validation sets, the algorithms achieved agreements of 0.862 (quadratically weighted kappa, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.840-0.884) and 0.868 (95% CI, 0.835-0.900) with expert uropathologists. Successful generalization across different patient populations, laboratories and reference standards, achieved by a variety of algorithmic approaches, warrants evaluating AI-based Gleason grading in prospective clinical trials.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Docetaxel plus Prednisone or Mitoxantrone plus Prednisone for Advanced Prostate Cancer
2004 · 5.691 Zit.
Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models
2006 · 5.028 Zit.
Increased Survival with Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer after Chemotherapy
2012 · 4.526 Zit.
Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
1998 · 4.482 Zit.
Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study
2009 · 3.986 Zit.
Autoren
- Wouter Bulten
- Kimmo Kartasalo
- Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen
- Peter Ström
- Hans Pinckaers
- Kunal Nagpal
- Yuannan Cai
- David F. Steiner
- Hester van Boven
- Robert Vink
- Christina Hulsbergen‐van de Kaa
- Jeroen van der Laak
- Mahul B. Amin
- Andrew Evans
- Theodorus van der Kwast
- Robert W. Allan
- Peter A. Humphrey
- Henrik Grönberg
- Hemamali Samaratunga
- Brett Delahunt
- Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Tomi Häkkinen
- Lars Egevad
- Maggie Demkin
- Sohier Dane
- Fraser Elisabeth Tan
- Masi Valkonen
- Greg S. Corrado
- Lily Peng
- Craig H. Mermel
- Pekka Ruusuvuori
- Geert Litjens
- Martin Eklund
Institutionen
- Radboud University Nijmegen(NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center(NL)
- Tampere University(FI)
- Karolinska Institutet(SE)
- Google (United States)(US)
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute(NL)
- Thales (Netherlands)(NL)
- Linköping University(SE)
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center(US)
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie(BR)
- University Health Network(CA)
- University of Toronto(CA)
- University of Florida(US)
- North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System(US)
- Yale University(US)
- Saint Göran Hospital(SE)
- The University of Queensland(AU)
- University of Otago(NZ)
- Aichi Medical University(JP)
- Out of the Fog Research (United States)(US)
- University of Turku(FI)
- Turku University Hospital(FI)