Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Abstract WP84: (VISIION): Viz.ai Implementation Of Stroke Augmented Intelligence And Communications Platform To Improve Indicators And Outcomes For A Comprehensive Stroke Center And Network
0
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Background: Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs) strive to narrow rt-PA and “Door To Groin” (DTG) neurointerventional (NIR) times. Process improvement workflows have been put in place for rt-PA. While similar processes have been implemented to streamline workflows for hyperacute NIR cases, complex pathways, disparate imaging locations, and fragmented communications all highlight a need for continued improvements. Methods: This quality improvement initiative (IRB #210525) was implemented to assess our transition to the Viz.ai platform for immediate image review and centralized communication and its effect on key performance indicators (KPIs) in an already robust CSC. We compared 6 month periods prior to and following deployment. Sequential stroke NIR patients were included. Both Direct Arriving LVO (DALVO) and telemedicine transfer LVO (BEMI) cases were assessed. We assessed subgroups of DALVO-OnHours, DALVO-OffHours, BEMI-OnHours, and BEMI-OffHours. Mann-Whitney U was utilized. Results: Eighty-two NIR cases were analyzed pre v. post Viz.ai implementation (DALVO-OnHours 7 v. 7, DALVO-OffHours 10 v. 5, BEMI-OnHours 13 v. 6, BEMI-OffHours 17 v. 17). DALVO-OnHours improved 19% (97min, 79min; p=0.201) in median DTG times. DALVO-OffHours had a significant 39% reduction (157min, 95min; p=0.009). DALVO-“All” showed a significant 32% reduction (127min, 86 min; p=0.006). BEMI-OnHours improved 18% (37min, 31min; p=0.337). BEMI-OffHours improved 38% (45min, 28min; p=0.077). BEMI-“All” significantly improved 33% (42min, 28min; p=0.036). Overall, there was a 22% reduction (50min, 39min; p=0.066) after Viz.ai implementation. Conclusions: There was an immediate KPI improvement following Viz.ai implementation for both direct arrival and telemedicine transfer NIR cases (32% and 33% respectively). In the greatest opportunity subset (direct arriving cases requiring team mobilization off hours without benefit of telemedicine transfer lead time) we noted a 39% improvement. With Viz.ai, we noted immediate access to images and streamlined group communications, even in an already well-functioning CSC. These results have implications for future care processes and can be a model for centers striving to optimize workflow and improve NIR timeliness.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19
2020 · 3.056 Zit.
Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies
2017 · 2.569 Zit.
The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence
2020 · 1.913 Zit.
Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
2020 · 1.859 Zit.
Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review
2016 · 1.769 Zit.