Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluating the Impact of Peer Review on the Completeness of Reporting in Imaging Diagnostic Test Accuracy Research
2022·4 Zitationen·Journal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen4
Zitationen
17
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 84.807 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.774 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 76.832 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.698 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.430 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- University of Ottawa(CA)
- Queen's University(CA)
- Ottawa Hospital(CA)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
- McMaster University(CA)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers(NL)
- University of Amsterdam(NL)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris(FR)
- Université Paris Cité(FR)
- Inserm(FR)
- Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences(NL)
- Wayne State University(US)
- Sorbonne Université(FR)
Themen
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsRadiation Dose and ImagingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education