Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The use and meaning of the parachute metaphor in biomedicine: a citation analysis of a systematic review and a randomized trial of the parachute for freefall
3
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
<b>Background:</b> Numerous authors have used the 'parachute' analogy to comment on the importance of and need for randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) in the hierarchy of medical evidence. <b>Methods:</b> The authors completed a retrospective literature analysis examining publications citing the 2003 parachute paper by Smith and Pell and a 2018 RCT of a parachute by Yeh <i>et al.</i> For all of the articles that directly analogized a medical intervention to a parachute, the authors identified the desired outcome of the practice and searched PubMed for relevant RCTs. <b>Results:</b> Authors citing the parachute analogy are often critical of RCTs and often draw comparisons to interventions that are not parachutes.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 85.301 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.806 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 76.958 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.803 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.524 Zit.