Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Online Symptom Checkers: Exploring the need for a standardised clinical validation process (Preprint)
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
<sec> <title>UNSTRUCTURED</title> The use of online symptom checkers (OSCs) is increasing but their safety, efficacy and impact on healthcare systems remain unclear. The lack of a standardised validation process and the absence of third-party testing requirements have resulted in significant variation in OSC clinical performance. Discrepancy in the findings of comparative studies to date suggests that several steps in OSC evaluation methodology can significantly influence outcomes. A uniform validation process with a clear specification is urgently required to objectively assess the performance of OSCs and help improve patient safety. Careful consideration and clear guidance for each of these steps will be required to create an objective validation standard that is robust and fair. An objective validation process could support the widescale adoption of OSC in the community setting with the potential to reduce pressure on scarce NHS resources, especially for self-limiting conditions. </sec>
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note
1997 · 14.557 Zit.
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
2011 · 13.723 Zit.
QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
2011 · 13.571 Zit.
A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions
1981 · 11.462 Zit.
Evidence-Based Medicine
1992 · 4.136 Zit.