Anatomical Gift Programs Continue to Meet Donor Demands of Anatomy Educators During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: Here’s How

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Schools of higher education across the US closed all operations and in‐person classes during the COVID ‐19 pandemic, significantly affecting laboratory‐based anatomy dissection courses and the anatomical gift programs (AGP) that support them. The purpose of this study was to investigate how the COVID‐19 pandemic affected AGP operations in the US. The researchers hypothesized that programs would modify donation acceptance criteria and that anatomy education demands for donors would be reduced during the first year of the pandemic. METHODS/ RESULTS The researchers sent a Qualtrics survey to 135 AGP directors with a response rate of 28% (n=38). Respondents were from 26 states and included 28 AGPs operating for 25 years or longer and ten programs operational for 15 years or less. Six AGP’s (16%) stopped accepting donors for varying lengths of time secondary to the COVID‐19 pandemic during its first year, while 32 programs (84%) continued operations. Of the programs that remained operational, 81% (n=26) made modifications to donor acceptance policies, while 19% (n=6) maintained existing acceptance policies. Schools that made policy modifications for donor acceptance criteria reported changes, including heightened screening for symptoms of COVID‐19 at the time of donor registration and upon death and requiring a negative COVID test for the anatomical donor near the time of death. In addition, COVID‐19 infection was added to the existing list of disqualifying conditions for many programs. Some sites excluded donors from large group facilities (hospitals, long‐term care), and some declined any donors with respiratory infections at the time of death. Several programs (13%) stopped accepting those donors who were not registered with their AGP prior to the onset of the COVID pandemic. During COVID‐19, the demand for donors in anatomy education decreased significantly (p<0.05). Reasons for the reduced donor demand as reported by respondents included school closings and adjusted (smaller, shorter in time) laboratory sessions. These actions were taken because of concern for student/staff safety, reduced availability of appropriate personal protective equipment, and safety‐related student/faculty spacing needs. CONCLUSION Most AGPs were operational during COVID‐19 and able to maintain donor needs for anatomy education. Further research is warranted into the long‐term effects on AGPs as the pandemic persists.

Ähnliche Arbeiten