Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Tailored PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams for living systematic reviews: a methodological survey and a proposal
48
Zitationen
8
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
<ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Background</ns3:bold> : While the PRISMA flow diagram is widely used for reporting standard systematic reviews (SRs), it was not designed for capturing the results of continual searches for studies in living systematic reviews (LSRs). The objectives of this study are (1) to assess how published LSRs report on the flow of studies through the different phases of the review for the different updates; (2) to propose an approach to reporting on that flow. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Methods</ns3:bold> : For objective 1, we identified all LSRs published up to April 2021. We abstracted information regarding their general characteristics and how they reported on search results. For objective 2, we based our proposal for tailored PRISMA approaches on the findings from objective 1, as well as on our experience with conducting Cochrane LSRs. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Results:</ns3:bold> We identified 279 living publications relating to 76 LSRs. Of the 279 publications, 11% were protocols, 23% were base versions (i.e., the first version), 50% were partial updates (i.e., does not include all typical sections of an SR), and 16% were full updates (i.e., includes all typical sections of an SR). We identified six ways to reporting the study flow: base separately, each update separately (38%); numbers not reported (32%); latest update separately, all previous versions combined (20%); base separately, all updates combined (7%); latest update version only (3%); all versions combined (0%). We propose recording in detail the results of the searches to keep track of all identified records. For structuring the flow diagram, we propose using one of four approaches. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Conclusion:</ns3:bold> We identified six ways for reporting the study flow through the different phases of the review for the different update versions. We propose to document in detail the study flow for the different search updates and select one of our four tailored PRISMA diagram approaches to present that study flow. </ns3:p>
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 84.807 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.774 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 76.832 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.698 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.430 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Cochrane(GB)
- American University of Beirut(LB)
- Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar(QA)
- Qatar Foundation(QA)
- Clinical Research Institute(US)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública(ES)
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre(ES)
- McMaster University(CA)
- University of Hull(GB)
- Hull York Medical School(GB)
- Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change(DE)
- Impact(CA)
- University of Johannesburg(ZA)
- Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research(DE)
- Stockholm Environment Institute(SE)