Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Ethical considerations for monetizable big data in healthcare (Preprint)
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
<sec> <title>UNSTRUCTURED</title> Since Henrietta Lacks’ death from cervical cancer, so-called HeLa cells have become a ubiquitous substrate for scientific advancement. Such scientific advancement has bred innovation, and innovation, profit. Yet, these innovations have been unevenly distributed across demographic groups. To ensure the ethical conduct of research and the equitable distribution of its benefits, biospecimens, like HeLa’s tissue, were protected under consent conventions of the Belmont Report. Likewise, during the genomic era, the “biospecimen" concept was forced to evolve again. A third era—that of informatics—has the potential to empower truly “personalized” medicine. Nonetheless, issues related to unequal focus of research efforts and unequal provision of innovation already exist. Additionally, with increasing ease of re-identification, the anonymity of individualized data is at risk. Redesign of consent protocols and redefinition of the biospecimen concept may be required once more to protect the donors of de-identified transcriptomic data—and their families, in the long-run. </sec>
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.819 Zit.
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
2005 · 8.938 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 6.947 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.225 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.514 Zit.