Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ReviewR: A light-weight and extensible tool for manual review of clinical records
2
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES Manual record review is a crucial step for electronic health record (EHR)-based research, but it has poor workflows and is error prone. We sought to build a tool that provides a unified environment for data review and chart abstraction data entry. MATERIALS AND METHODS ReviewR is an open-source R Shiny application that can be deployed on a single machine or made available to multiple users. It supports multiple data models and database systems, and integrates with the REDCap API for storing abstraction results. RESULTS We describe two real-world uses and extensions of ReviewR. Since its release in April 2021 as a package on CRAN it has been downloaded 2,204 times. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION ReviewR provides an easily accessible review interface for clinical data warehouses. Its modular, extensible, and open source nature afford future expansion by other researchers. LAY SUMMARY When doing research using data from electronic health records (EHRs), data may need to be extracted by hand, either to perform the study or to ensure its accuracy. However many researchers can’t access the EHR for this purpose. Even when researchers have access, they must flip between their review list, the EHR, and the location they are recording the results of their review, which is difficult and can cause errors. We developed a software application, ReviewR, to make this process easier and less error prone and have used it in two real-world projects.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 84.856 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.787 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 76.851 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.738 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.458 Zit.