Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparing human and AI performance in medical machine learning: An open-source Python library for the statistical analysis of reader study data
1
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract In seeking to understand the potential effects of artificial intelligence (AI) on the practice of diagnostic medicine, many investigations involve collecting interpretations from several human experts on a common set of cases. In an effort to standardize the process of analyzing the data emerging from such studies, we have released an open-source Python library to perform applicable statistical procedures. The software implements the industry-standard Obuchowski-Rockette-Hillis (ORH) method for multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) studies. The tools can be used to compare a standalone algorithm against a panel of readers, or compare readers operating in two modalities (for example, with and without algorithmic assistance). The software supports both nonequivalence and noninferiority tests. Functions are also provided to simulate reader and model scores, useful for Monte Carlo power analysis. The code is publicly available in our Gitub repository at https://github.com/Google-Health/google-health/tree/master/analysis .
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
1995 · 105.998 Zit.
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
1997 · 54.938 Zit.
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
1986 · 38.724 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 37.530 Zit.
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
2002 · 35.964 Zit.