Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The Validity of Machine Learning Procedures in Orthodontics: What Is Still Missing?
15
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) models and procedures hold remarkable predictive efficiency in the medical domain through their ability to discover hidden, non-obvious clinical patterns in data. However, due to the sparsity, noise, and time-dependency of medical data, AI procedures are raising unprecedented issues related to the mismatch between doctors' mentalreasoning and the statistical answers provided by algorithms. Electronic systems can reproduce or even amplify noise hidden in the data, especially when the diagnosis of the subjects in the training data set is inaccurate or incomplete. In this paper we describe the conditions that need to be met for AI instruments to be truly useful in the orthodontic domain. We report some examples of computational procedures that are capable of extracting orthodontic knowledge through ever deeper patient representation. To have confidence in these procedures, orthodontic practitioners should recognize the benefits, shortcomings, and unintended consequences of AI models, as algorithms that learn from human decisions likewise learn mistakes and biases.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.526 Zit.
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
2017 · 13.148 Zit.
A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
2019 · 11.758 Zit.
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
2017 · 8.122 Zit.
Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
2015 · 7.991 Zit.