Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Big Health Data Research and Group Harm: The Scope of IRB Review
33
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Much of precision medicine is driven by big health data research-the analysis of massive datasets representing the complex web of genetic, behavioral, environmental, and other factors that impact human well-being. There are some who point to the Common Rule, the regulation governing federally funded human subjects research, as a regulatory panacea for all types of big health data research. But how well does the Common Rule fit the regulatory needs of this type of research? This article suggests that harms that may arise from artificial intelligence and machine-learning technologies used in big health data research-and the increased likelihood that this research will affect public policy-mean it is time to consider whether the current human research regulations prohibit comprehensive, ethical review of big health data research that may result in group harm.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.818 Zit.
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
2005 · 8.922 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 6.932 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.203 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.482 Zit.