Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Considerations for Developing Ethical Biomedical Grant Proposals for the National Institutes Of Health
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
Highly trained medical writers are typically familiar with case studies of scientific misconduct, defined as data fabrication, data falsification, and plagiarism. However, less than 2% of researchers are thought to engage in scientific misconduct. In recognition that avoiding scientific misconduct is only a small part of research ethics, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) released the following statement in 2009: “[R]esponsible conduct of research is defined as the practice of scientific investigation with integrity. It involves the awareness and application of established professional norms and ethical principles in the performance of all activities related to scientific research.” This guiding principle can be used to shape every aspect of our work when developing grant proposals.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.819 Zit.
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
2005 · 8.938 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 6.947 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.225 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.514 Zit.