Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Give Me Convenience and Give Her Death: Who Should Decide What Uses of\n NLP are Appropriate, and on What Basis?
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
As part of growing NLP capabilities, coupled with an awareness of the ethical\ndimensions of research, questions have been raised about whether particular\ndatasets and tasks should be deemed off-limits for NLP research. We examine\nthis question with respect to a paper on automatic legal sentencing from EMNLP\n2019 which was a source of some debate, in asking whether the paper should have\nbeen allowed to be published, who should have been charged with making such a\ndecision, and on what basis. We focus in particular on the role of data\nstatements in ethically assessing research, but also discuss the topic of dual\nuse, and examine the outcomes of similar debates in other scientific\ndisciplines.\n
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization
2017 · 20.336 Zit.
Generative Adversarial Nets
2023 · 19.841 Zit.
Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks
2014 · 15.241 Zit.
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.227 Zit.
On a Method to Measure Supervised Multiclass Model’s Interpretability: Application to Degradation Diagnosis (Short Paper)
2024 · 13.114 Zit.