Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Blueprint for harmonising unstandardised disease registries to allow federated data analysis: prepare for the future
14
Zitationen
16
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Real-world evidence from multinational disease registries is becoming increasingly important not only for confirming the results of randomised controlled trials, but also for identifying phenotypes, monitoring disease progression, predicting response to new drugs and early detection of rare side-effects. With new open-access technologies, it has become feasible to harmonise patient data from different disease registries and use it for data analysis without compromising privacy rules. Here, we provide a blueprint for how a clinical research collaboration can successfully use real-world data from existing disease registries to perform federated analyses. We describe how the European severe asthma clinical research collaboration SHARP (Severe Heterogeneous Asthma Research collaboration, Patient-centred) fulfilled the harmonisation process from nonstandardised clinical registry data to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model and built a strong network of collaborators from multiple disciplines and countries. The blueprint covers organisational, financial, conceptual, technical, analytical and research aspects, and discusses both the challenges and the lessons learned. All in all, setting up a federated data network is a complex process that requires thorough preparation, but above all, it is a worthwhile investment for all clinical research collaborations, especially in view of the emerging applications of artificial intelligence and federated learning.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
1986 · 38.745 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 37.543 Zit.
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
2018 · 37.131 Zit.
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2011 · 33.471 Zit.
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2019 · 28.346 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden(NL)
- European Respiratory Society(CH)
- University of Southampton(GB)
- NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit(GB)
- Bispebjerg Hospital(DK)
- University of Copenhagen(DK)
- British Lung Foundation(GB)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers(NL)
- University of Amsterdam(NL)
- Leiden University Medical Center(NL)