Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice
45
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are quickly gaining ground in healthcare and clinical decision-making. However, it is still unclear in what way AI can or should support decision-making that is based on incapacitated patients' values and goals of care, which often requires input from clinicians and loved ones. Although the use of algorithms to predict patients' most likely preferred treatment has been discussed in the medical ethics literature, no example has been realised in clinical practice. This is due, arguably, to the lack of a structured approach to the epistemological, ethical and pragmatic challenges arising from the design and use of such algorithms. The present paper offers a new perspective on the problem by suggesting that preference predicting AIs be viewed as sociotechnical systems with distinctive life-cycles. We explore how both known and novel challenges map onto the different stages of development, highlighting interdisciplinary strategies for their resolution.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Early Palliative Care for Patients with Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
2010 · 7.311 Zit.
Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation
2005 · 5.263 Zit.
Rehospitalizations among Patients in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Program
2009 · 5.157 Zit.
On death and dying.
1975 · 4.940 Zit.
Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)
1997 · 4.083 Zit.