Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
An Intelligent Approach for Semantic Plagiarism Detection in Scientific Papers
1
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Plagiarism is the attempt to steal someone else’s idea and portray it as your own, which is both unlawful and unethical. Plagiarism detection is described as the automatic detection of written items that have been reused. Modern Plagiarism detection software often examines text documents using a text representation and text similarity approaches to look for words that appear in both suspicious and source documents. The widespread use of the internet and simple access to textual content has increased the demand for automated plagiarism detection. This paper proposes an intelligent approach to detect semantic plagiarism in scientific papers. A corpus for storing the text of source scientific papers in order to compare the suspicious documents with it and detect plagiarism have been created. The documents are clustered into numerous groups using the Mini-Batch K-Means clustering algorithm, then get the documents in a specified category. The Universal Sentence Encoder (USE) intelligent model, was employed to extract textual features. The report of plagiarism percentage will be displayed as a web page and can be downloaded as a pdf file. A decision is made to accept or reject the suspicious scientific paper according to a threshold value. To evaluate the proposed system, it is compared with Turnitin platform for Plagiarism Detection (PD), the result of comparison indicates that the proposed system is reliable. The findings promote and can reduce the percentage of plagiarism after deleting some unnecessary parts of the suspicious document.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
2022 · 2.691 Zit.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
1998 · 2.490 Zit.
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
2012 · 2.303 Zit.
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
2009 · 1.919 Zit.
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
2023 · 1.751 Zit.