Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Algorithmic Fairness in Chest X-ray Diagnosis: A Case Study
3
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Machine learning models are being increasingly deployed in real-world clinical environments. However, these models often exhibit disparate performance between population groups, potentially leading to inequitable and discriminatory predictions. In this case study, we use several distinct concepts of algorithmic fairness to analyze a deep learning model that predicts from their chest X-ray whether someone has a disease. After observing disparities in the false positive rate and false negative rate between groups from several protected classes, we apply algorithmic fairness methods to remove such disparities. However, we find that such algorithmic interventions can have serious unintended consequences. Finally, we question what the appropriate definition of fairness is in the clinical context, and advocate for an investigation of bias in the data whenever possible, as opposed to blindly applying algorithmic interventions.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 28.787 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.485 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.734 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.099 Zit.