Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Human-Centered Design to Address Biases in Artificial Intelligence (Preprint)
2
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
<sec> <title>UNSTRUCTURED</title> The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to reduce health care disparities and inequities is recognized, but it can also exacerbate these issues if not implemented in an equitable manner. This perspective identifies potential biases in each stage of the AI life cycle, including data collection, annotation, machine learning model development, evaluation, deployment, operationalization, monitoring, and feedback integration. To mitigate these biases, we suggest involving a diverse group of stakeholders, using human-centered AI principles. Human-centered AI can help ensure that AI systems are designed and used in a way that benefits patients and society, which can reduce health disparities and inequities. By recognizing and addressing biases at each stage of the AI life cycle, AI can achieve its potential in health care. </sec>
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
1986 · 38.745 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 37.543 Zit.
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
2018 · 37.131 Zit.
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2011 · 33.471 Zit.
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2019 · 28.346 Zit.