Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII
376
Zitationen
13
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Even though radiomics can hold great potential for supporting clinical decision-making, its current use is mostly limited to academic research, without applications in routine clinical practice. The workflow of radiomics is complex due to several methodological steps and nuances, which often leads to inadequate reporting and evaluation, and poor reproducibility. Available reporting guidelines and checklists for artificial intelligence and predictive modeling include relevant good practices, but they are not tailored to radiomic research. There is a clear need for a complete radiomics checklist for study planning, manuscript writing, and evaluation during the review process to facilitate the repeatability and reproducibility of studies. We here present a documentation standard for radiomic research that can guide authors and reviewers. Our motivation is to improve the quality and reliability and, in turn, the reproducibility of radiomic research. We name the checklist CLEAR (CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics research), to convey the idea of being more transparent. With its 58 items, the CLEAR checklist should be considered a standardization tool providing the minimum requirements for presenting clinical radiomics research. In addition to a dynamic online version of the checklist, a public repository has also been set up to allow the radiomics community to comment on the checklist items and adapt the checklist for future versions. Prepared and revised by an international group of experts using a modified Delphi method, we hope the CLEAR checklist will serve well as a single and complete scientific documentation tool for authors and reviewers to improve the radiomics literature.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 28.795 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.500 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.736 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.101 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi(TR)
- İstanbul Başakşehir Çam ve Sakura Şehir Hastanesi
- University of Health Sciences Antigua(AG)
- Eskişehir City Hospital(TR)
- Universitätsklinikum Würzburg(DE)
- University of Pennsylvania(US)
- Intel (United States)(US)
- University of Salerno(IT)
- Harvard University(US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital(US)
- National Center for Tumor Diseases(DE)
- German Cancer Research Center(DE)
- Heidelberg University(DE)
- Massachusetts General Hospital(US)
- University Hospitals Geneva Medical Center(US)
- HES-SO Valais-Wallis(CH)
- University of Geneva(CH)
- University Hospital of Geneva(CH)
- Institut Curie(FR)
- Université Paris Sciences et Lettres(FR)
- Inserm(FR)
- Goethe University Frankfurt(DE)
- University Hospital Cologne(DE)
- University of Naples Federico II(IT)
- OncoRay(DE)
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus(DE)
- Technische Universität Dresden(DE)
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf(DE)