Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Systematic reviewers used various approaches to data extraction and expressed several research needs: a survey
9
Zitationen
9
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Systematic reviewers used varying approaches to pilot data extraction. Methods to reduce errors and use of support tools such as (semi-)automation tools are top research gaps.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 85.000 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.791 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 76.889 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.764 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.481 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Witten/Herdecke University(DE)
- Technische Universität Berlin(DE)
- Universitätsmedizin Göttingen(DE)
- La Trobe University(AU)
- University of British Columbia(CA)
- St. Michael's Hospital(CA)
- Cochrane(CA)
- The University of Adelaide(AU)
- Catholic University of Croatia(HR)
- Centre for Excellence in Mining Innovation(CA)
- Unity Health Toronto
- University of Toronto(CA)
- Public Health Ontario(CA)
- Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane(DE)