Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
PyTrial: Machine Learning Software and Benchmark for Clinical Trial Applications
1
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Clinical trials are conducted to test the effectiveness and safety of potential drugs in humans for regulatory approval. Machine learning (ML) has recently emerged as a new tool to assist in clinical trials. Despite this progress, there have been few efforts to document and benchmark ML4Trial algorithms available to the ML research community. Additionally, the accessibility to clinical trial-related datasets is limited, and there is a lack of well-defined clinical tasks to facilitate the development of new algorithms. To fill this gap, we have developed PyTrial that provides benchmarks and open-source implementations of a series of ML algorithms for clinical trial design and operations. In this paper, we thoroughly investigate 34 ML algorithms for clinical trials across 6 different tasks, including patient outcome prediction, trial site selection, trial outcome prediction, patient-trial matching, trial similarity search, and synthetic data generation. We have also collected and prepared 23 ML-ready datasets as well as their working examples in Jupyter Notebooks for quick implementation and testing. PyTrial defines each task through a simple four-step process: data loading, model specification, model training, and model evaluation, all achievable with just a few lines of code. Furthermore, our modular API architecture empowers practitioners to expand the framework to incorporate new algorithms and tasks effortlessly. The code is available at https://github.com/RyanWangZf/PyTrial.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
1995 · 106.040 Zit.
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
1997 · 54.958 Zit.
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
1986 · 38.733 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 37.535 Zit.
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
2002 · 35.974 Zit.