Electronic health record “gag clauses” and the prevalence of screenshots in peer-reviewed literature

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Office of the National Coordinator's policy change restricting the use of "gag clauses" in contracts between electronic health record (EHR) vendors and healthcare facilities increased the prevalence of screenshots in peer-reviewed literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed EHR usability and safety-related peer-reviewed journal articles from 2015 to 2023 and quantified the number of articles containing screenshots. For those that did not contain screenshots, we identified whether they would have benefited from screenshots. RESULTS: When gag clauses were permitted 6 of 79 (7.6%) of articles contained screenshots and 8 (10.1%) would have benefited from screenshots. When gag clauses were restricted 3 of 40 (7.5%) contained screenshots and 8 (20%) would have benefited from screenshots. DISCUSSION: The policy change does not appear to have an impact on the prevalence of screenshots in peer-reviewed literature. CONCLUSIONS: Additional steps are necessary to promote the use of screenshots in peer-reviewed literature.

Ähnliche Arbeiten