Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices
40
Zitationen
12
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Misconduct seems to be the most frequently recorded reason for retraction across empirical analyses of retraction notices, but other reasons are not negligible. Greater specificity of causes and standardization is needed in retraction notices.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
2022 · 2.691 Zit.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
1998 · 2.488 Zit.
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
2012 · 2.303 Zit.
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
2009 · 1.918 Zit.
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
2023 · 1.739 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Yonsei University(KR)
- Kyung Hee University Medical Center(KR)
- Sungkyunkwan University(KR)
- Samsung Medical Center(KR)
- Anglia Ruskin University(GB)
- Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu(ES)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental(ES)
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats(ES)
- University of Ottawa(CA)
- Ottawa Hospital(CA)
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin(DE)
- Barwon Health(AU)
- Deakin University(AU)
- Chung-Ang University(KR)
- Severance Hospital(KR)
- Stanford Health Care(US)