Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
From ‘publish or perish’ to ‘publish for purpose’
33
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract Pressures to publish prolifically have led to an abundance of research on trivial matters rather than on issues of significance. This trend is particularly pronounced in developing countries, where limited access to paid content has fueled the growth of open‐access publications. Additionally, the prevailing “publish or perish” culture has encouraged the pursuit of inconsequential and conformist research. The scholarly integrity of academic institutions is eroded when they struggle with evaluating research impact through metrics, potentially overlooking substantive contribution. The emergence of AI technology adds a fresh dimension to the issue, creating new possibilities for mass output rather than work that is innovative or informed by social values and priorities. This commentary serves as a call to action for scholars, institutions, and policymakers collectively to reshape the trajectory of academic publishing, restoring its sense of purpose through making lasting contributions to the betterment of society.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
2005 · 11.423 Zit.
How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines
2021 · 11.239 Zit.
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
2015 · 8.558 Zit.
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review
2002 · 6.969 Zit.
Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization
2014 · 6.286 Zit.