Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Citation screening using large language models for creating clinical practice guidelines: A protocol for a prospective study
1
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract Background The development of clinical practice guidelines requires a meticulous literature search and screening process. This study aims to explore the potential of large language models in the development of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock (J-SSCG), focusing on enhancing literature search quality and reducing the citation screening workload. Methods A prospective study will be conducted to compare the efficiency and accuracy of literature citation screening between the conventional method and a novel approach using large language models. We will use the large language model, namely GPT-4, to conduct literature searches for predefined clinical questions. We will objectively measure the time required for citation screening and compare it to the time taken using the conventional method. Following the screening, we will calculate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the results obtained from the conventional method and the large language models-assisted process. The total time spent using both approaches will also be compared to assess workload reduction. Trial registration This research is submitted with the University hospital medical information network clinical trial registry (UMIN-CTR) [UMIN000053091]. Conflicts of interest All authors declare no conflicts of interest to have. Funding None
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 87.395 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.932 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.384 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.130 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.808 Zit.